Djokovic Wins 6th Australian Open and 11th Slam to Tie Laver, Borg, Emerson

Djokovic Wins 6th Australian Open and 11th Slam to Tie Laver, Borg, Emerson

It was inevitable. Who was going to stop the slow hardcourt GOAT(and likely soon to be hardcourt GOAT) on Plexicushion in the prime of his career? That’s correct, no one. Djokovic was the overwhelming favorite to win a third consecutive slam in Melbourne before the tournament began.

Anyone who had a little bit of tennis knowledge and wasn’t biased beyond belief knew it. With his 6-1, 7-5, 7-6(3) victory over Murray today he proved once again that he reigns supreme Down Under and that he is going to be awfully hard to stop there over the coming years.

I overslept and joined the match when Djokovic was a break up in the second set only to get broken right back. Well, Djokovic didn’t waste any time getting that all important first set under his belt, did he? He couldn’t have made a more ideal start.

When I joined the match Murray was playing well though and doing everything in his power to square things up at a set all. He was being very aggressive, not only in his game but in his body language as well. It appeared to me like he was trying to intimidate the Djoker.


I like how calm Djokovic stays in those moments. While Murray is grunting on every shot and seems to be making a huge physical effort Djokovic hardly even grunts himself and every time he wins a big point he makes sure to let Murray know it with a loud ‘Come on!’.

He really owns Murray big time in the mental department. Murray, to the contrary, kept ‘giving the business to his box‘ broadcasting his frustrations to his opponent and everyone else. I honestly don’t think he can help himself.

He needs Lendl in his box for whom he has too much respect to ‘give the business to’. Clearly Mauresmo has no effect on him in that regard. After Murray had broken back at 3-4 both players held serve and at 5-5 and 40-15 Murray had two game points on his serve.

Djokovic just wouldn’t let him go though as he won the next four points with more baseline mastery to break Murray. That was another key passage of play there after Djokovic breadsticked Murray in the opening set.


With Djokovic serving for the set then at 6-5 and 30-15, something strange happened when Djokovic served two consecutive double faults to present Murray with a break back point. Djokovic wouldn’t be denied however as he won the next three points to go up two sets to love.

The outcome was inevitable but Murray did well to make the score respectable and force a tiebreak. As was the case in the second set, Murray came back from a break down after Djokovic broke serve in the opening game of the third set.

Murray could have just given up the ghost right there so credit to him for fighting back and making the third set the closest set. In the tiebreak, Djokovic quickly raced to a 6-1 lead. Murray held both serves to get back to 3-6 but Djokovic then ended it in style with an ace.

What a champion!

  • Final Thoughts

Winning never gets old they say. And they are right. I think most people expected Murray to win a set in the final at least and I think for Djokovic to get it done in straight sets was kinda special. That meant poor Murray fell to 0-5 in Australian Open finals.

And his problem remains mental as far as I’m concerned. Djokovic is just a far superior player in that department. Murray has all the shots. He may even be more talented than Djokovic. He certainly has better hands at the net.

But mentally the difference is light years. Like I keep saying, Djokovic is a mental monster. And it clearly wasn’t that way from the start. That is what is so inspirational about him. He actually used to be fragile mentally, retiring from matches for almost any reason.

Watching him grow and evolve as a tennis player has been a treat and gives anyone hope that you don’t need to be born with certain qualities to be successful but that you can develop them over time and that continual growth is all important.


If you look at Federer, for instance, you see someone who was blessed with pretty much limitless talent. And yet it seems he is the one that stagnated and stopped growing. Of course, in recent times he has done very well to make changes to his game and reinvent himself as a better offensive and net player, but he isn’t making any progress as far as beating Djokovic goes.

If anything, the losses are getting worse. And yet, he still seems to believe the match is on his racquet against the Djoker. That’s what he says. But it sure wasn’t on his racquet when Djokovic ‘roasted him alive'(as an objective Fedfan put it) in the first two sets of their match in Melbourne this year.

This objective Fedfan made a comment on my last post saying that Federer can’t accept that the match is not on his racquet anymore and I agree. It’s the same thing that happened in the early days against Nadal. There is a kind of arrogant pride that doesn’t allow Federer to accept the truth and adjust accordingly.

When you get blasted off the court 6-1, 6-2 then there is simply no way the match is on your racquet. And then I see Fedfans comment on forums that Federer didn’t show up for the first two sets.

It is that exact kind of arrogance/denial which cost Federer and his fans on countless occasions. ‘Federer is a god that can’t do anything wrong and if something does go wrong then the problem must lie somewhere else. It is never Federer’s fault because he is a perfect god’.

This is why their newest angle is now the fact that Djokovic sits in an oxygen chamber to recover from matches which, by the way, is completely legal. It is one thing to accuse Nadal of doping but now they are seriously reaching.

Other than the fact that this scientific study proves that sitting in an oxygen chamber does nothing to aid recovery or enhance performance, how did Federer’s chronic back problems all of a sudden disappear never to return?

How does he show hardly any decline at all at age 34? You see, it’s not hard to invent conspiracy theories. And until someone comes up with some real proof, I am not going to assume things just because a desperate fanbase wants me to.

If Fedfans want to believe that Federer is a perfect god that never does anything wrong then I’m not going to stop them. But I don’t believe in that kind of idolization of a human being. As far as I’m concerned Federer has plenty of flaws as a tennis player and as a human being.

And unless he does something about it there is a good possibility that Djokovic will surpass him in the GOAT debate.

  • What Does the Future Hold for Djokovic?

So to get back to Federer’s flaws. There have always been a kind of denial about him which cost him big time against players who were not intimidated by him like Nadal and Djokovic. Djokovic is now probably a completer player than Federer ever was.

He has a better backhand, better returns, better movement/fitness, and he is mentally more stable under pressure. Federer has a better serve, forehand, and volleys. Djokovic has caught up with Federer and Federer doesn’t seem to want to admit it.

He is still using the same game plan and thinking the match is on his racquet. As a result, he just suffered his worst slam beating at the hands of Djokovic in recent times. He is still doing his real fans proud, but he is not getting any closer to Djokovic.

To the contrary, Djokovic is getting closer to him in the GOAT debate. With this title Djokovic equaled Emerson’s record of six Australian Open titles and he is also now equal with Laver and Borg in terms of slams won.

That is some serious company to be in and he is still in his prime. There is no doubt that Djokovic is currently playing the best tennis of his career and that he is completer than ever as a player and human being.

With the 6th Australian Open title behind him, we can now finally begin to seriously look forward. For the second time in his career, he is on a run of three consecutive slam titles. And for the second time, he will have a shot at completing the ‘Djoker slam’ at the French Open.

In 2012, Nadal spoiled it for him in the French Open final. With Nadal having seriously declined of late and Djokovic grilling him alive at the French last year already, you would think his chances of doing it this year are very good.

If it wasn’t for a brutal draw at the French last year Djokovic could have already completed the calendar slam. It is highly doubtful that he will receive a draw like that again this year. The argument from Fedfans is that it is said every year that this is the year that Djokovic will win the elusive French Open.

Personally, I wasn’t overly optimistic last year that Djokovic could get it done after I saw the draw. I think it is much more likely that he gets it done this year. My feeling is that this is the year he gets it done. But we will see.

I think the possibility alone is exciting. No one has completed the personal slam since Laver won the calendar slam in ’69. Strictly speaking, that is not a personal slam but like a personal slam, it is also four slam titles in a row.

Neither Federer nor Nadal has completed a calendar slam or a personal slam so if Djokovic achieves it, it would count for a lot. If he wins the French it would also mean he completes the career slam so the stakes will be at an all-time high in the French capital this year.

If Djokovic does pull it off, which I don’t doubt that he can, he will already be in the GOAT debate. He would have done something Fedal couldn’t do and he already leads them in the head-to-head. That would also release a lot of pressure on him and he could go on to win many more slams.


Who knows, maybe even the calendar slam itself. So I think there is a very exciting time ahead in tennis. For some fans, this domination from Djokovic is becoming boring but it was the same with Sampras and Federer. Welcome to tennis.

For us Djokovic fans, it is exciting times because there is a possibility of something very special being done in tennis and by our favorite player at that.

  • Thank You

Just a thank you to my readers for the blog support over the past fortnight and I hope you enjoyed my coverage of this year’s Australian Open. As usual, there is a lot to cover after a grand slam final and I won’t fit everything into one post so I will probably make another one tomorrow and then take a break.

Until later!

  • Highlights

  • Presser

Q. It’s the first month of the year. You’ve already had convincing wins over your three biggest rivals in your career. Do you allow yourself in your mind to acknowledge that perhaps you’ve separated yourself from them a bit at the moment?
NOVAK DJOKOVIC: I don’t want to allow myself to be in that frame of mind. Because if I do, the person becomes too arrogant and thinks that he’s a higher being or better than everybody else. You can get a big slap from karma very soon. I don’t want that.

I found this to be a very interesting presser. Did Federer become too arrogant and thought he was a higher being? His fans certainly treated him that way. I’ll let people make up their own minds but Djokovic has the ideal attitude I think.

He is humble and takes nothing for granted. Always trying to improve. Never getting complacent. For that reason, I wouldn’t be surprised if he surpasses Federer.

The is in your court.

Posted in Australian Open, Grand Slams.


    1. Hi Ru-an,

      As predicted, Murray could not breakthrough. He makes Djokovic work hard the last 2 sets but that’s about it, another beating at the hands of the undisputed world no.1.

      Somehow the Melbourne AO court suits Djokovic perfectly
      There was once Federer had great success by winning 4 before the change of surface. Australian Open prove to be the hardest to win for Murray. Even Nadal could only manage to win one in his prime.

      The probability for Djokovic able to win FO and rest of the slams is not impossible as no one seems to be able to challenge him consistently. Is like Serena in the WTA tour whom occasionally gets beaten but the win is largely in her hands.

      if Federer would have retired after winning his last GS at Wimbledon 12′ then his head to head record against Djokovic would be still intact. 3 years has since passed he make it to 3 GS final but all lost at the hands of

      it is still a joy to watch Federer as a fan whenever he makes it deep, but not so when he gets beaten repeatedly by the same player. It’s worse if he doesn’t accept the brilliance of his opponent and his gradual decline. It is no doubt in my mind whenever they in the court in a GS, Djokovic had the mental edge. Once the game gets started it almost feel like Federer is always playing the catch up. His energy level too dropped from the previous matches as though he didn’t want to be on the court facing his demons. I think until he fixed his mental strength there is no way he can beat Djokovic (unless he is injured) in a best of 5 format. However, time is running up, he will be 35 soon whereas Djokovic is still at his prime. Unless he is willing to die on the court to win he probably end up just 17 GS. For me, his best chance was the USO 14′ as he didn’t have to face Djokovic or Nadal in the final. But he screwed up and get beaten by a one slam wonder Cilic. Prove me wrong, I hope so.


      Ru-an Reply:

      Unfortunately for Fedfans, everything you say is true, IWC. This was supposed to be the time Federer wins #18 but he didn’t count of the Djoker’s dominance. In fact, if it wasn’t for Djokovic this would have been a new era of Federer dominance. But like you say, it is only getting worse for him and he is getting older. It’s not looking promising for him as far as winning #18 goes.


    1. Very good analysis, Ru-an. Writing something critical of Roger takes guts, but you’re doing it. Not many have the balls to do it, especially the mainstream media, probably for fear of losing some revenue streams, which I understand.

      However, I don’t know for how long they can keep ignoring Novak’s achievements. Most articles I’ve read in the last few hours after AO still point to his alleged disconnect with most fans. Instead of celebrating his historic results.

      Another cause for Novak to aim even higher and prove them wrong.

      Go, Novak! The Djoker slam is a very real possibility.


      Ru-an Reply:

      Thank you, Jun! Your comment means a lot. Fortunately, I don’t write for the mainstream media so I don’t have to worry about revenue streams or being fake. Integrity and enjoying what I do is more important to me. I’d hate to get paid to write for mainstream media but to be told what to write.

      Where is the fun in that? Eventually, people will appreciate Novak anyway and come to my blog. It’s just a question of time before he conquers all and they are back again.


      universal123 Reply:

      You think your media is bad. Over here in the UK we have perhaps some of the worst media reporting in the world, at least as far as newspapers go. Our two main tabloids and two main broadsheet newspapers are both ridiculous. We have The Daily Mail (tabloid) and The Daily Telegraph (broadsheet) which are both ridiculously right-wing newspapers, presenting hugely biased accounts and literally directly endorsing the UK Conservative Party, whilst The Daily Mirror (tabloid) and The Guardian (broadsheet) are ridiculously left-wing and directly endorse the UK Labour Party. It’s absolutely insane over here, the only real source of fairly unbiased media is the BBC, which at least manages to present both sides of a story. Media bias is a huge problem over here, it’s insane.



      Ru-an Reply:

      That doesn’t surprise me about the UK. They are probably second only to the US in terms of media bias and brainwashing. Everything is about materialism, worldly success, conformity, etc. It’s a kind of oppressive society that doesn’t encourage you to think outside the box. That is why someone like Federer is so popular there while Djokovic is seen as an intruder/villain/unwanted because he is from an eastern European country and doesn’t belong to the status quo.


    1. Hi Ru-an. Just heard the unfortunate news today that Federer has had knee surgery for a torn meniscus and will miss Rotterdam and Dubai. Hope he is completely fine and caught up on training by Wimbledon, but part of me is worried that this season will descend into another 2013, which wouldn’t be fun to watch no matter who you support. Just to clear up any doubt, I’m not saying that this played a role in his defeat to Djokovic, quite the opposite, Federer clearly said that he injured it the day after, presumably in a practice session I guess. Just mostly hoping that he will be OK. Apparently just a bit of keyhole surgery so nothing too serious hopefully. To be honest I’d rather he sat out a couple more tournaments to make sure the knee is OK before coming back onto the tour, rather than risk making things worse. But of course, Roger will have the best doctors and physios, etc and people who can tell him when he is OK to start playing again, so I’m sure he will make the right decision. Nevertheless, since I am a balanced fan, I will be watching Dubai and Rotterdam. To be honest I think that people who stop watching once their favourite player is out of a tournament are a bit pathetic, and it just shows that those people aren’t really tennis fans, they are just cult followers of a particular player. Some of the comments I have seen on forums actually disgust me. People just seem to lose sight of the big picture, which is that tennis is a sport, and your favourite player is just one small part of that sport, even as a top player. No one, no one is bigger than the sport and no one should be given favouritism because of their status. When I hear of things like Nadal/Team Nadal stopping an umpire from officiating his matches, it just smacks of favouritism, and there are numerous other cases with other players as well. It’s just unacceptable.


      Ru-an Reply:

      Hey, Charlie. Yes, a shame about the injury and I wish Federer a speedy recovery. But he also needs to find a solution to Djokovic. Maybe that injury is a physical manifestation of not being able to find a solution to Djokovic. The body and mind are connected so who knows. I’m glad it is not too serious anyway and that he will miss only two events.

      I’m also glad to hear the tear occurred after the SF and that it didn’t hamper him during the match because his movement seemed just fine. I’m glad you will stay interested in tennis as well. That is what a true tennis fan would do. But be careful about criticizing Nadal because that is exactly what the fanatical Fedfans do.

      Not saying what Nadal did was right, of course, but I think you know what I mean.


      universal123 Reply:

      Yeah, but I feel like that is a fair argument. I would never take it any further than what I said there. I have seen things written about the families of players and criticising players for their relationships (there were some people trying to excuse what Kyrgios said to Wawrinka by talking about his relationship with Donna Vekic, which just doesn’t hold water in my book).


    1. I’d just like to give Novak a shout out for his incredible consistency.

      I just noticed that – if not for one loss to Stan at AO ’14 in the QF – AO’16 would mark his 23rd consecutive showing of semifinal or better at major tournaments, which would have tied Roger’s record.

      Very well done indeed.



Copyright © 2020 Ultimate Tennis Blog