Nadal Wins Record Sixth Straight Title at Monte Carlo

Well for once Nadal has done something that Federer has not done, which is to win six straight titles of any professional tournament, when he beat Verdasco in the final of Monte Carlo today, 6-0, 6-1. He also becomes the first man in the open era to do so. Of course Federer has won five straight titles at both the US Open and Wimbledon, and on both occasions he came awfully close to making it six in a row, losing in five sets to Del Potro at the US Open and in five sets to Nadal at Wimbledon. Having won five consecutive titles at two slams is also one of Federer’s most impressive records, because no one else has achieved that feat. For me Nadal’s four straight Roland Garros title is far more significant then his six straight Monte Carlo tournaments. But what he did today just further strengthens his case for being the clay court GOAT.

And if you look at the fact that he dropped only fourteen games throughout the tournament it is even more impressive. Verdasco on the other hand was not so impressive. I get very frustrated when I watch Verdasco play, because he has so much potential, but his head is a mess. As far as raw talent goes it is my opinion that he has even more than Nadal, but as far as mentality goes they are complete opposites. Verdasco did his best to throw away a set and a 5-1 lead against Montanes in the quarter final. He really had no business losing the second set, and in the third it looked like Montanes was spent, losing it 6-0. In the semi-finals Verdasco put up a better performance when he beat Djokovic 6-2, 6-2. Djokovic on the other hand was awful.

Against Nadal it was clear that Verdasco had to play attacking tennis. Whenever he went for his shots and played attacking tennis, he almost always won the point. Last year Roger and Soderling showed that Nadal can be beaten by playing attacking tennis against him on clay, so it is possible. I felt Verdasco had the weapons to give Nadal a really tough match, but he just played a terrible match. He didn’t play with any real intent or self belief. He played as if he was happy with being in the final and wanted Nadal to win a sixth title. To me that is just sinful if you are a professional tennis player. You simply have to maximize your talent and play every as if it is your last, like Nadal does. This match was the perfect example of the fact that talent is secondary to mental toughness. You have two players who are pretty equal in the talent department(as I said I believe Verdasco may be even more talented), yet the one serves the other a bagel and a bread stick.

I think if Verdasco had Nadal’s head on his shoulders he would have won something like ten slams by now. That is how much of an underachiever he is, and that’s what Federer could have become if he didn’t make an attitude change at one point in his career. And thank God he did, or we would have been deprived of so much beauty and excitement. It must be said that Nadal is looking better now than he did at last year this time. He just looks fresh and really motivated for the clay season, and I also hear that he is not going to play Madrid. I think he made a big mistake by playing Madrid last year, which may have cost him the French Open. He is playing so many clay court events already, that playing Madrid as well is just too much, and because Madrid is higher above sea level it is not ideal preparation for him going into the French Open either.


It seems Nadal has finally learned something about scheduling. But it is more his form that I’m worried about. If he keeps playing as well as he did in Monte Carlo, he will make things very difficult for Roger once again at Roland Garros. I’m still thinking in terms of Federer winning the calender slam. I realize it is a very lofty goal, but he if can win the French Open he would have a real shot at it. We will see how the clay season unfolds, but Nadal is looking very dangerous right now. He still hans’t beaten a top 10 player in Monte Carlo, but you would think it will just be a question of time before he does so in the clay season. This coming week it will be Barcelona, of which the draw you can find HERE. It will probably be another easy victory for Nadal, and then finally Roger will kick off his clay season in Rome. Can’t wait ;-)

Posted in Uncategorized and tagged , .

7 Comments

  1. You should have more faith in Roger. He’s a great champion and he relishes the greatest challenges, which means beating Nadal at RG. Now that he has the trophy he can concentrate solely on the tennis rather than worrying about the career Slam, Sampras’ records, etc. Nadal will not make it easy, but Roger doesn’t want it to be easy.

    I’ll believe Nadal’s going to skip Madrid when I see it. His position in the rankings has always been based on sweeping the clay season and accumulating as many points as he can, and he’s just not going to want to miss the chance to pick up more points, especially in his home country.

    Plus clay is like a security blanket for Nadal. He needs the feeling of perfect safety he has on clay, otherwise he can’t play freely. He has to play everything to maintain that feeling.

    [Reply]

    Ru-an Reply:

    I do have faith in him, but lets be realistic. Nadal is a better clay court player.

    [Reply]

  2. Monte Carlo is important win for Nadal as confidence booster. If he was to lose to Verdasco, well that is different ball game all together. I am happy that he finally ends his title drought. Let’s wait and see how Roger fair in Rome.

    [Reply]

  3. I´m not completely sure Nadal is back. He still hasn´t won against a top ten player.So why Nadal winning M.C.
    without facing a top ten player means that he will be threat to Roger?
    Of course Verdasco was happy,spaniards will never beat Nadal do you remember last year?, it´s something known,
    so Barcelona is for him too.
    In my opinion M.C.was a horrible Master 1000???

    [Reply]

    ines Reply:

    Sorry, it was:”he will be a threat to R”

    [Reply]

  4. Dear Ruan
    Long time! Let’s be honest Monte Carlo said nothing. There was no one in the draw and that trophy biting again. We’ve been free of it this last year. I hope we won’t have to see it much more.
    I said last year Nadal is finished and I believe he is. Rolling on the ground shows how little confidence he has. Winning a tournament without 5 of the top ten and beating Verdasco (who has no heart and plays to the gallery all the time) means nothing. I am sure Roger will win Roland Garros and he will beat Nadal in the process.
    But more than all this, what I hate is the continued reference to his bad knees from commentators. Many players have had injuries that affected their performance, they don’t make anything of it and commentators don’t refer to it, so why Nadal’s so called knees? I am tired of hearing of it. Aren’t you?

    [Reply]

    Ru-an Reply:

    Hi Hope. Yeah im tired of it too. I like your positivity. Would be great if Roger can beat Nadal at Roland Garros :-)

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *