Tuesday January 5th, 21h30, Roger Federer is chatting on the backseat of the car that drives him back from the stadium to the Ritz-Carlton hotel in Doha. The interview has been suggested to him unexpectedly and he said : “No problem, just get in the car”. When this kind of things happen, you don’t ask the driver if he’s got his driving license; you just jump in the car. Here we go. Federer is beginning his 12th year on the tour. But this one is different: ‘It’s the 2nd half-time of my career’ he says. Grand Slam titles record? Done. Roland-Garros? Done. So what’s left?
Q: For the first time since a long time, you start the season not having to answer those 2 questions: ‘Are you going to break Sampras’ record any time soon?’ and ‘Are you finally going to win Roland-Garros?’ Do you miss them?
RF: (he laughs) Now I’m done with unpleasant questions! Frankly, it’s relaxing. A year ago, I was no2 in the world, I was about to lose the final in Melbourne and people were relentlessly questionning me.
Q: Now that you’ve won at least once each of the Grand Slams, now that you hold the Grand Slams titles record, don’t you feel a sense of emptiness?
RF: It’s the end of a period. Within one month last year, between RG and Wimbledon, I reached those 2 great goals. I think it changed my life, but I never felt ‘empty’ afterwards. I’ve never woken up one morning asking myself: ‘What do I do now?’ We’re lucky because tennis is a very dense sport. There’s the rankings, Grand Slams, Masters 1000, head-to-heads… Sometimes I motivate myself jsut by thinking about the history I have with one player. [Murray at the end of last year? LOL]
Q: You haven’t felt the need to think about what happens next, about your goals?
RF: No. The desire to play comes naturally. What I often do is that I go back to the beginning: why did I chose tennis as a kid? why did I work so hard during all those years? what do I like so much when I play tennis? And the answers come easily. It’s simple: I don’t really think there is someone who loves tennis more than I do.
Q: But don’t you feel like a burden has disappeared?
RF: Yes and no. Personally I think the pressure is always there, and it’s a good thing. It’s a different pressure, but it has not disappeared. Anyway, if one day ther’s nobody to put pressure on me anymore, I’ll still be there to put it on myself. I don’t even remember having played a match without feeling any pressure.
Q: You like challenges [they do not mean Hawk-Eye ], so here are some. Tell us if you’re motivated by them.
RF: OK, here we go.
Q: You need 2 more Mesters 1000 to beat Agassi’s record of 17.
RF: Mmmmmh. I’m not really excited by that. Masters 1000 have been existing only for 20 years, and I don’t know how many of them great players from the past could have won. So this record does not mean much.
Q: Another challenge. If you stay world no1 after RG, you’ll beat Sampras’ all-time record of 286 weeks.
RF: This, is an important record to me. When I beat Connors’ record (consecutive weeks as world no1) I already thought it was really great. Staying in the front that long when you know who is behind you, it’s not easy. By the way, my main goal this year is to finish the year no1 in the world. It has been so hard to get that ranking back.
Q: So you want to stay no1. What else?
RF: To win more tournaments. Last year, I won 4 of them. They were big ones, but I have to be able to do better. I lacked titles in smaller tournaments. True, I had to withdraw several times, because of an injury or because I needed some rest (Dubai, Halle, Tokyo). So I focused entirely on big tournaments, and I don’t really like it. Before I withdraw from Tokyo last year, I had told Seve (Luthi): ‘I’m going there to serve-and-volley on 1st and 2nd serves’. Because I thought it could help me later.
Q: Speaking of later, when do you think you’ll end your career?
RF: To calm down everybody, I said I’ll play until the 2012 Olympic Games in London. But it’s a minimum. I don’t think I’ll stop there. I see myself playing after, but differently. I’ll try to play some new tournaments, to do some exhibitions in South America, where I’ve nearly never been to.
Q: You’re in the top10 since you’ve entered it in October, 2002. Do you think today’s top10 is stronger than back in 2002, with Safin, Hewitt, Novak, Henman, Grosjean, Ferrero?
RF: Tough suestion. I’m not so sure. Nowadays, the guys have less weaknesses but maybe also less main strengths. Before, players were more suprising, with more varied games. It was harder to dominate on a specific surface. Nowadays playing conditions are been standardized and the payers as well. Often, when I watch players like Davydenko, Del Potro or Djokovic, I wonder what their best shot is…
Q: If you had to chose one player that is going to reach a new milestone in 2010, who would it be?
RF: If I had to chose only one, it would be Murray. He has built himself cleverly, he won a lot of Masters 1000, he already has a lot of experience. That being said, Del Potro never won a Masters 1000 but still won the US Open. A year ago, I would never have said predicted that. He was not really using the strength of his serve, unlike now. He’s improved so much.
Q: And what about the winner of the World Tour Finals, who just beat you 2 times in a row?
RF: Oh, Davydenko! I can tell you I’m going to follow him very closely in Melbourne. The Australien Open is going to show us if he can keep up with this rythm, and if he can beat us in best-of-five matches. This is so much interesting!
Q: Monfils, Tsonga, Simon, Gasquet, you’re interested?
RF: A lot. We all know they have a big potential. Let’s say they confirmed it last year. Now, they need to make a breakthrough and therefore to be less injured. Richard is going to go up quite fast. The big question is how far?
Q: Nadal has not won a tournament since Rome last year, in May. Some think he’ll never be what he once were.
RF: This is bullshit [‘conneries’ in French]. It reminds me what people said about me last year. I’ve seen Rafa play in Abu Dhabi and in Doha: he lacks absolutely nothing. Granted, he’s not won in a long time. But look at those who beat him: Del Potro, Murray, Davydenko, Djokovic, Soderling… They’re not bad! Think about it: had he played Wimbledon last year and not lost 2,000 points from his victory in 2008, where would he be right now? He came back from injury, so it’s normal that he lacked confidence. But to me, the really great Rafa is still to come.
Q: You never had any serious injuries. The Australian Open is your 41th GS tournament in a row. Is it hard work or luck?
RF: Both. I’m expecting myself to be fit in big tournaments. You cannot just come at Grand Slams with a small injury. Ladies can handle the 3 first rounds while healing, men just can’t. My style of play helps me to last longer. Most of the time, I decide how the point is played, I make the other one run. When Rafa takes 45 minutes to win a set, I can take 30. I worked really hard when I was a junior to build myself an efficient armour. Now, I work less hard, but more precisely.
Q: You’re 28 and you can’t recover as fast as before. Is it why you hired Stephane Vivier, a French physio?
RF: He’s from Marseille on top of that! (he laughs) It’s true that your age matters. Until this season, I always had masseurs, and I wanted to work with a physio. He had worked a long time with the ATP and I didn’t want people to think that I was stealing him, like ‘Sorry guys, but I’m Federer. Now he’s mine’. I think everybody took it well.
Q: What do you mean by ‘working more precisely’?
RF: When you’re young, you don’t warm up. You play on your PlayStation and when you’re called to play the match, you leave. Now, I consistently take a 10-minutes muscle warm-up right before the match. I strengthen my back nearly everyday because I’ve had problems in the past. I’ve always felt my back wasn’t strong enough.
Q: And what about your sleep? Word is that you sleep like a log.
RF: True! If I don’t sleep 11 or 12 hours a day, it’s not right. If I don’t have that amount of sleep, I hurt myself. When the twins cry and that I’m in a tournament, I put my earplugs and I go back to sleep.
Q: You withdrew from the Davis Cup 1st round. Is it because it’s against Spain, in Spain, and on clay?
RF: Not because it’s Spain. Just because it’s on clay. Between Dubai and Indian Wells, it just doesn’t fit. It saddens me, but I know why I took that decision.
Q: Some said it was self-centred and unpatriotic. People thought that after having beaten Sampras’ record you would be able to play the Davis Cup…
RF: People have to understand that it’s just not possible to do everything. Had I made another choice, maybe I wouldn’t have wom RG last year. Do people prefer me to play the Davis Cup or to hold the GS record? Don’t Swiss people prefer having me as the world no1? If I play it and then it costs me in the rankings, people will always be there to tell me: ‘Ho, hum, you’re not no1 anymore!’
Q: Is it really impossible to do both?
RF: I consider that a Davis Cup round amounts to take out one Masters 1000. And I’m not ready to do that. I still favour my individual choices; time will come when this changes. You also have to understand that I do not have a team as abundant as Rafa’s with Spain. I’m not complaining. It’s just a fact. Rafa hasn’t played the quarterfinals and the semifinals last year. But people saw him as the star in the finals. They just forgot he wasn’t there before.
Q: Have you spoken to Tiger Woods since his problems were revealed?
RF: Yes, he is my friend and I told him I was there to support him. It’s really tough for him and his family to see their intimate problems flaunted everywhere.
Q: Have you learned something from the magnitude of this story?
This is instructive. The tabloids are going crazy, sponsor contracts are falling apart… I’ve always been aware that the image you patiently construct for an entire career can be ruined in a minute. It scares you a bit, but that’s the way things are. Tiger needs calm. And soon he’ll become the wonderful golfer that we know again.
There’s also a comment on Federer’s training with Monfils yesterday in Melbourne and a guy in Monfils’ team said: ‘They were playing really well. During the 1st set, Roger was literally flying on the court. I felt like he was playing without his racket! When you see him playing like that, with so much ease, you start thinking that he could really play until his mid-30s.’
So apparently no problem with the wrist!
Question for the ladies: Roger or the chocolate racquet?
I copied this interview in the comments of All I Need Is A Picket Fence, with the permission of WhyNotMe , who translated it from French to English. I thought WhyNotMe did an excellent job of translating the article from the French paper L’equipe, and thanks to her for letting me use it. This is probably the best interview I have ever seen from Roger. Maybe because it was in such informal circumstances, and I thought the interviewer asked the right questions as well. There is so much to ponder in this interview, and I have highlighted some of the things I thought stood out. At the start I thought it’s important to note that Roger is not feeling empty after last his achievements last year, firstly because of his love for the sport, and secondly because he is self-motivated.
Then it’s interesting to see what his main goal for the year is, and also the fact that he wants to win more tournaments. I have said of late that I think Roger is just focusing on the slams, but that is clearly not the case. I think I’ve been reading a bit too much in tennis forums. When Roger loses in he smaller tournaments, the general consensus is that Roger tanked or didn’t try or something of the sort. I never really bought that. I think Roger did try in the smaller events, but he is just better in the slams and the five set format these days. Roger is not in his prime anymore where he can win almost every tournament he plays. Then again Roger mentions the fact that he wants to play even until after the 2012 Olympics. There is something I have been thinking of late.
With Roger dominating tennis the way he has, wouldn’t it be really hard for him to continue if he starts being less dominant? I mean lets say he starts losing before the semi-finals of grand slams, which is bound to happen at some point. That would almost damage his legacy if you look at the standard he has set. How long can he still keep up the standard he has set at the slams? Guys like Del Potro, Djokovic and Murray will only become harder to beat, and surely he doesn’t want to have negative head-to-head records with these guys. Already he has a negative one’s with Murray and Rafa. So hearing him say that he will play after the 2012 Olympics is always nice to hear, and hopefully that will happen. Also it’s interesting to see that Roger thinks Murray will be the next mover.
Personally I haven’t been impressed much by Murray, and it seemed like a lot of the hype surrounding him has been unjustified. But I guess Roger has a point about him building himself up at the Masters Series events. Remember Roger himself did not win a slam until he was 21, so I guess there is reason to believe that Murray will still deliver on his promise. Also what he says about Rafa I find quite interesting, not to mention funny. This is bullshit? Lol! I’m quite surprised to hear him say that the great Rafa is till to come. I can’t see how that can be the case with Rafa’s taxing game style. Already the injuries have started showing up, and the flat hitters have given him more and more trouble. I guess we will just have to see who is right, because I will stand by my statement that Rafa’s best is behind him.
It’s also interesting to note that Roger sleeps 11-12 hours a night. Wow! That’s almost hibernation! Finally, his comments about Woods have been a long time coming. Nice to see he is supporting his friend and the last quote that I bolded is what Roger is about. It’s one thing to be a sports legend, but another to be a great human being as well. It seems Tiger’s success went to his head and he forgot that he is human. This is why I like Roger so much. He is not just a great tennis player, he is also a great human being and a real role model. I guess the final paragraph says it all. Roger is looking great for the Oz Open, and the way he plays he may well play into his mid thirties. Awesome interview, don’t you think?